NON-PERFORMING LOANS AND UNILATED CONFISCATION BY LEASING COMPANIES LEGAL REVIEW OF DEBTORS' LEGAL PROTECTION IN FIDUCIARY AGREEMENTS

Authors

  • Ismed Ismed Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi
  • Fitri Rafianti Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi

Keywords:

Legal Protection, Fiduciary Guarantee, Unilateral Execution

Abstract

Fiduciary agreement is one of the legal instruments widely used in consumer financing practices, especially in the motor vehicle purchase sector through a leasing scheme. In this system, the vehicle becomes the object of fiduciary collateral that remains in the control of the debtor, while the ownership rights are legally transferred to the creditor until the debt is paid off. Although this mechanism is legally valid and supported by Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Collateral, in practice there are often deviations, especially in terms of execution of collateral by leasing companies when debtors experience bad credit. One of the most crucial forms of deviation is the act of unilateral confiscation or withdrawal of fiduciary objects without going through the proper legal process, often carried out without a fiduciary certificate and involving uncertified debt collectors.

This study aims to examine the provisions of Indonesian positive law governing the procedure for executing fiduciary guarantees in cases of bad debts and to evaluate the form of legal protection that can be provided to debtors against unilateral confiscation practices by leasing companies. Using a normative legal approach and qualitative analysis, this study analyzes related laws and regulations, including the Fiduciary Guarantee Law, the Consumer Protection Law, and a number of Constitutional Court Decisions such as Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019, Number 2/PUU-XIX/2021, and Number 71/PUU-XIX/2021. The results of the study indicate that unilateral execution of fiduciary guarantees without a court order is contrary to the principle of due process of law and does not guarantee fair legal protection for debtors.

This study recommends the need for more consistent law enforcement, increased supervision of financing companies, and strengthening public legal literacy, so that debtors' rights can be effectively protected in fiduciary contracts. Comprehensive legal protection is not only important to maintain the balance of legal relations between debtors and creditors, but also to create a healthy, fair, and civilized national financing climate.

References

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 1999 Number 168.

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 1999 Number 42.

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1946 concerning Criminal Law Regulations as amended into the Criminal Code (KUHP).

Civil Code (Burgerlijk Wetboek).

Regulation of the Minister of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia Number 130/PMK.010/2012 concerning Fiduciary Registration for Motor Vehicle Consumer Financing Companies.

Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 29/POJK.05/2014 concerning the Implementation of Financing Company Business.

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2019). Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 concerning the Testing of Article 15 paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of the Fiduciary Guarantee Law.

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2021). Decision Number 2/PUU-XIX/2021 concerning the Testing of the Explanation of Article 30 of the Fiduciary Guarantee Law.

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2021). Decision Number 71/PUU-XIX/2021 concerning Interpretation of Fiduciary Guarantee Execution by the Authorized Party.

SIP Law Firm. (2023). Vehicle Withdrawal Procedures by Leasing After the Constitutional Court Decision. Retrieved fromhttps://www.siplawfirm.id.

Financial Services Authority. (2021). OJK Affirms Fiduciary Guarantee Execution Must Follow Constitutional Court Decision. Retrieved from https://www.ojk.go.id.

Anthoni, Agus. (2023). “Legal Review of Forced Vehicle Repossession by Debt Collectors Without a Repossession Letter.” Bevinding Journal, Vol. 1 No. 8: 1–16.

Hukumonline. (2022). MK: Execution of Fiduciary Certificates Can No Longer Be Unilateral. Retrieved fromhttps://www.hukumonline.com.

Hukumonline. (2021). MK Declares Police Have No Authority to Execute Fiduciary. Retrieved fromhttps://www.hukumonline.com.

Subekti. (2008). Contract Law. Jakarta: Intermasa.

Lestari, Andini. (2021). “Analysis of Legal Protection for Debtors in the Execution of Fiduciary Guarantees.” Lex Generalis Law Journal, Vol. 2 No. 4: 891–902.

Fitriyanti, Rina. (2020). “The Power of Execution of Fiduciary Guarantee Certificates After Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019.” Justitia Law Journal, Vol. 6 No. 1: 101–116.

Utomo, Haryadi et al. (2020). “Construction of Legal Protection for Debtors in Fiduciary Agreements.” Ampera Journal of Legal Science, Vol. 2 No. 2: 155–165.

Prasetyo, Teguh. (2015). Law Enforcement: Theory and Practice. Jakarta: Kencana.

Simanjuntak, Marihot. (2019). Consumer Protection in Fiduciary-Based Consumer Financing. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-05

How to Cite

Ismed, I., & Rafianti, F. (2025). NON-PERFORMING LOANS AND UNILATED CONFISCATION BY LEASING COMPANIES LEGAL REVIEW OF DEBTORS’ LEGAL PROTECTION IN FIDUCIARY AGREEMENTS. Law Sinergy Conference, 2(1), 597–605. Retrieved from https://conference.sinergilp.com/index.php/lsc/article/view/85

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.