LEGALITY OF DIGITAL EVIDENCE IN PROVIDING CYBER CRIMES IN COURT

Authors

  • Khairul Huda Rizka Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi
  • Fitri Rafianti Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi
  • Mhd. Azhali Siregar Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi

Keywords:

Digital Evidence, Criminal Evidence, Criminal Procedure Law

Abstract

The development of crime in the digital era has given rise to new challenges in the criminal justice system, especially in terms of evidence. Digital evidence is now a central element in cybercrime cases, replacing the dominance of conventional evidence. Although positive Indonesian law, through Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions (UU ITE) and its amendment in Law Number 19 of 2016, has explicitly recognized electronic information and/or electronic documents as valid legal evidence, this normative recognition has not been fully effective in court practice. This article examines the legal basis for recognizing digital evidence, the challenges of its application in the criminal justice process, and the need for regulatory updates and strengthening institutional capacity. Using a normative legal approach and analysis of a number of jurisprudence, it was found that digital evidence is very vulnerable to issues of integrity, authenticity, and procedural deviations, such as ignoring the chain of custody. The lack of uniformity in technical procedures in criminal procedure law also worsens the position of digital evidence before judges. Therefore, a comprehensive revision of the Criminal Procedure Code and the establishment of digital forensic technical guidelines are needed to ensure the legality and effectiveness of evidence in cybercrime cases. This study shows that without the support of adaptive regulations and digitally competent officers, the recognition of digital evidence will lose its functional power in upholding criminal justice.

References

Dhadha, Tegar Pan, Laras Atika Rahayu, Dewi Sito Resmi, and Dora Kusumastuti. 2021. “The Effectiveness of the Role of the ITE Law in Protecting and Maintaining All Cyber Activities in Indonesia.” Legal Standing: Journal of Legal Studies 6 (1): 40–48.

Ersya, Muhammad Prima. 2017. “Legal Issues in Tackling Cyber Crime in Indonesia.” Journal of Moral and Civic Education 1 (1): 50–62.

Hasibuan, Aulia R Hakim, Indra Utama Tanjung, and Kharisma Preety Queen Br Panjaitan. 2024. Criminal Law in Product Reviews on Social Media. Serasi Media Technology.

Hasibuan, Aulia Rahman Hakim, Indra Utama Tanjung, and Kharisma Preety Queen Br Panjaitan. 2024. “Legal Protection for Consumers from Defamation Crimes Due to Product Reviews on Social Media.” In Law Sinergy Conference Proceeding, 1:337–44.

Ibrahim, Wan Nora Wan. 2021. “An Empirical Study on Cybercrime: The Emerging Threat to Banking Sectors in Malaysia.” Tun Abdul Razak University. Malaysia.

Lawalata, Jesylia Hillary, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu, and Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa. 2022. “Restorative Justice Approach in Resolving Narcotics Crime Cases at the Investigation Stage.” TATOHI: Journal of Legal Studies 2 (1): 91–112.

lwan Rasiwan, H, and MH SH. 2025. The Principle of Balance of the New Criminal Code Reflects Pancasila Values in Law Enforcement. Takaza Innovatix Labs.

State, Third Amendment to the Constitution. 2001. “Republic of Indonesia in 1945.” In accordance with the order of chapters, articles and verses, (Jakarta: Secretariat General of the MPR RI, 2006).

Nurdin1, Merry Kurniawati, Chika Aurel Rivaldi, Novia Rahmadani, Hilyah Az Zahra4, Andika Rayhan, and Putra Herang5. nd “THE ROLE OF TELEMATICS LAW IN SOLVING CYBERCRIME CASES.”

Rofiqoh, Anita Zulfiani. nd “Unraveling the Phenomenon of Cybercrime in the Realm of Economic Criminal Law: Presenting New Challenges for Law Enforcement in the Digital Era.”

Setiawan, M Nanda. 2021. “Criticizing the ITE Law Article 27 Paragraph (3) Viewed from the Socio-Politics of Indonesian Criminal Law.” DATIN Law Journal 2 (1): 1–21.

Winarno, Wahyu Agus. 2011. “A Study on the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE).” Journal of Economics, Accounting and Management 10 (1).

Yam, Jim Hoy. 2022. “Reflections on Mixed Methods Research.” EMPIRE 2 (2): 126–34.

Yoserwan, Yoserwan. 2023. “The Existence of Customary Criminal Law in National Criminal Law After the Ratification of the New Criminal Code.” UNES Law Review 5 (4): 1999–2013.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-05

How to Cite

Khairul Huda Rizka, Fitri Rafianti, & Mhd. Azhali Siregar. (2025). LEGALITY OF DIGITAL EVIDENCE IN PROVIDING CYBER CRIMES IN COURT. Law Sinergy Conference, 2(1), 529–536. Retrieved from https://conference.sinergilp.com/index.php/lsc/article/view/76

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.