Constitutional Justice in the Shadow of Political Interests Analysis of the Legal Reasoning of Constitutional Judges
Keywords:
Constitutional Justice, Legal Reasoning, Constitutional CourtAbstract
Constitutional justice is a fundamental principle in a state governed by the rule of law, requiring that every action of state officials consistently adhere to the constitution and be free from political interference. However, in Indonesian constitutional practice, the Constitutional Court often finds itself in a dilemma when its decisions directly impact electoral interests and the agendas of those in power. This study examines how constitutional judges' legal reasoning operates when the constitution is confronted with intense political situations, and how certain decisions demonstrate the tension between the principles of constitutional justice and the dynamics of legal politics.
This research employs a normative juridical approach by examining Constitutional Court decisions, particularly those with significant political impact. The analysis focuses on the construction of legal arguments, methods of constitutional interpretation, and their coherence with the principles of constitutional justice as understood in modern constitutional theory. Various literatures, such as Jimly Asshiddiqie's thoughts on the democratic rule of law, Ran Hirschl's concept of the judicialization of politics, and the principle of checks and balances, serve as analytical foundations for interpreting the reasoning of constitutional judges. The results show that the tension between law and political interests does not always result in deviations, but often gives rise to inconsistencies in legal argumentation that erode public trust. This is evident in several strategic decisions that expand or restrict citizens' political rights. Ultimately, this research offers the perspective that strengthening the integrity, quality of reasoning, and transparency of judges' deliberations are key prerequisites for the Constitutional Court to continue functioning as a guardian of constitutional justice amidst the maelstrom of political interests.
References
Ackerman, Bruce. 1991. We the People: Foundations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. 2006. The Indonesian Constitution and Constitutionalism. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. 2005. Models of Constitutional Testing. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. 2010. Constitutional Court Procedural Law. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Hirschl, Ran. 2004. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Mahfud MD, Moh. 2010. Building Legal Politics, Upholding the Constitution. Jakarta: LP3ES.
Mahfud MD, Moh. 2009. Constitution and Law in Controversial Issues. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Raz, Joseph. 1979. The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Soekanto, Soerjono. 1986. Introduction to Legal Research. Jakarta: UI Press.
Strong, C.F. 1966. Modern Political Constitutions. London: Sidgwick & Jackson Ltd.
Tanya, Bernard L., Yoan N. Simanjuntak, and Markus Y. Hage. 2013. Legal Theory: Human Order Strategies Across Space and Generations. Yogyakarta: Genta.
Wheare, KC 1971. Modern Constitutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 concerning the Judicial Review of Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation.
Constitutional Court Decision Number 14/PUU-XI/2013 concerning the Election System.
The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indra Utama Tanjung

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.











