Restorative Justice in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System

Abstract

This study evaluates the implementation of restorative justice in the criminal justice system in Indonesia, especially in terms of its effectiveness in reducing recidivism as well as the perception and acceptance by the community and legal stakeholders. Restorative justice, which emphasizes reconciliation, mediation between perpetrators and victims, and social reintegration, offers a more humanistic approach compared to the traditional justice system that focuses on punishment. The results of the study indicate that restorative justice can significantly reduce the rate of recidivism, especially if supported by effective mediation and good reintegration programs. In addition, victims involved in this process feel more satisfied because they have the opportunity to be heard and understand the results achieved.

However, the implementation of restorative justice in Indonesia still faces various challenges, including diverse perceptions and varying acceptance among the community and legal professionals. In some areas, especially those with local traditions of conflict resolution, restorative justice is more easily accepted. However, in urban areas, this approach is often considered too soft and does not provide sufficient deterrent effects. Other inhibiting factors are the lack of understanding, education, and training among law enforcement, as well as structural barriers that exist in the Indonesian criminal justice system.

The conclusion of this study suggests that to ensure the success of restorative justice in Indonesia, greater efforts are needed to address these barriers. This includes improving supportive regulations, public education, and ongoing training for legal professionals. In this way, restorative justice can be more effectively integrated into the Indonesian criminal justice system.