THE POWER OF EVIDENCE OF AUTHENTIC DEEDS IN CIVIL DISPUTE SETTLEMENT IN COURT
Keywords:
Authentic Deed, Probative Power, Civil DisputeAbstract
This study discusses the evidentiary power of authentic deeds in resolving civil disputes in Indonesian courts. Authentic deeds, as regulated in Article 1868 of the Civil Code, are written evidence that has perfect evidentiary power in matters carried out and witnessed directly by authorized public officials. In judicial practice, authentic deeds are often submitted as the main evidence, especially in cases of debt agreements, sales, leases, and inheritance. However, the application of the evidentiary power of authentic deeds often raises debate among judges, practitioners, and academics, especially regarding the extent to which the binding power of authentic deeds applies formally and materially.
This study uses normative legal research methods, with a statutory, conceptual, and case approach. The analysis was conducted on the Civil Code, the Notary Law, the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, and Supreme Court decisions. The results of the study indicate that, although authentic deeds provide evidentiary advantages, their application in court is not absolute. Judges still have discretion to assess the material and formal truth of the deed, and consider factors such as formal defects, the substance of the statement, and the validity of the parties' wishes.
In addition, the development of legal digitalization presents new challenges related to the recognition of electronic deeds as evidence. Therefore, comprehensive regulatory updates, increased notary competence, and consistent application of jurisprudence are needed so that the evidentiary power of authentic deeds can more effectively guarantee legal certainty in the modern era.
References
Fuller, L. (1964). The Morality of Law. Yale University Press.
Harahap, MY (2005). Civil Procedure Law. Sinar Grafika.
Hasanuddin. (2017). Civil Evidence Law. Prenadamedia Group.
Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2016). Decision No. 235 K/Pdt/2016.
Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2017). Decision No. 2875 K/Pdt/2017.
Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2019). Decision No. 1624 K/Pdt/2019.
Mertokusumo, S. (2009). The Discovery of Law: An Introduction. Liberty Yogyakarta.
Mulyadi, L. (2013). Civil Procedure Law: Theory and Practice. Rajawali Pers.
Putra, B. (2021). Electronic Deeds and Legal Evidence in the Digital Era. Prenadamedia Group.
Sjahdeini, SR (2011). The Development of Notarial Deeds in Indonesia: Historical and Legal Studies. UI Press.
Soekanto, S. (1986). Factors Influencing Law Enforcement. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Subekti, R. (2014). Law of Evidence. Pradnya Paramita.
Indonesia. (1847). Civil Code (Burgerlijk Wetboek voor Indonesia).
Indonesia. (2004). Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 2004 Number 117.
Indonesia. (2014). Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 2014 Number 3.
Indonesia. (2008). Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 2008 Number 58.
Indonesia. (2009). Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 2009 Number 157.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rizki Munardi , Fitri Rafianti , Mhd. Azhali Siregar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.